There's money in wind

Ithaca 37

New member
Joined
Mar 4, 2001
Messages
5,427
Location
Home of the free, Land of the brave
Soon there will be wind powered energy generators you can put on your roof for less than $10,000. I'll be buying one as soon as it's practical.
----------------------------------------

There's money in wind
It's not too late to get in on the ground floor


AUSTIN -- Remember the guy in "The Graduate" who tells Dustin Hoffman, with heavy emphasis, "Plastics"? This column is sort of in the same vein. Psst, kids, there's money in wind. If I were a fresh graduate looking for something useful and profitable to do with my life, I'd sure take a close look at windpower.
The American Wind Energy Association recently met in Austin, and danged if there aren't over 500 businesses involved, and vendors with high-tech booths and all that good trade show stuff. As they say on Wall Street, there's been "solid growth" in the wind biz. Naturally, the United States is lagging behind Denmark, et al, but even so, this thing is ginnin'. This will be huge.

According to the Wind Energy Association, they expect the industry to grow by 25 percent in 2003, moving from the current production of 4,700 megawatts to 6,000 megawatts (enough to serve 1,500,000 homes).

The industry is still small enough and new enough so you can sit around and drink coffee with already-legendary founders and pioneers such as Dan Juhl, who has a windfarm in Minnesota. As with the computer industry at its inception, you can almost see this one moving gradually from dreamers and tinkerers in garages to big business. Still not many suits around, and there's lots of shared excitement and enthusiasm and the sense of being "present at the creation."

There are lots of amazing potential side effects -- saving the family farm, for one. Representatives from Willie Nelson's FarmAid were at the convention, along with a guy from the American Corn Growers Foundation and others who see the opportunities in "wind farming." The best venues for mass-scale wind power are the Dakotas, the Upper Midwest, generally, Kansas and Texas. Texas, of course, will be the Saudi Arabia of wind, so don't get your hopes up that this will finally put the Great State out of the energy business.

Wind power makes so much sense that no one really needs to make the case for it. It's at competitive prices now, and it beats the tar out of nuclear power plants and scraping the top off every mountain in West Virginia. Just put a windmill on top of the mountain instead. The only known drawback to this is that one of the early wind farms in California, near Palm Springs, was built in a bird flyway. Killed a lot of birds. Since bird flyways can be mapped, no one needs to make that mistake again. Otherwise, we're looking at completely clean energy, infinitely renewable, and it can only get cheaper.

Wind power can be done at almost any level: The big windmills like the ones in the huge wind farm being built offshore from Denmark, require an investment of $1 million each. But there are also people in the business selling small mills, enough to power one house or farm, for about $40,000.

Windpower needs what every other energy source in this country has received -- a boost from the government. When did nuclear, oil, gas and coal not get tax credits, depreciation allowances, subsidies, special breaks and the full range of corporate welfare? There's a House bill pending that would give a 15 percent tax credit up to $2,000 on a small mill.

A more ambitious effort called Project Apollo, a 10-year, $300-billion research plan to promote energy efficiency and reduce dependence on foreign oil has just been endorsed by 10 major labor unions, including steel and auto workers. And why are the big unions suddenly green? Because cheaper energy will preserve American manufacturing jobs, which are now hemorrhaging to the Third World.

"We believe this plan can create good manufacturing jobs, good construction jobs, can improve public infrastructure, can be good for the environment and can reduce our dependence on foreign oil," said Leo Gerard, president of United Steelworkers, at a news conference last week.

Politically, of course, the problem is we have an administration largely populated by oil and gas people with a vested interest in keeping out renewables, and a Congress that responds only to big money donations. And there ain't no bigger money than oil and gas money. The countervailing forces are the common sense of the American people and the competitive advantage that will go to nations with cheap, renewable energy. If Denmark suddenly becomes an economic powerhouse, you'll know why.

As long as we're on the environment, the Pew Oceans Commission Report released last week is grim indeed: The oceans are being fished out at an appalling rate. Many countries subsidize their fishing fleets, and the result is a disastrous level of overfishing. I know the Bush Administration doesn't like multilateral treaties, but this is a perfect example of why it's wise to keep your relations with other countries in good working order -- rather than punishing old allies for failing to encourage you in a war to stop weapons of mass destruction that can't even be found.

http://www.workingforchange.com/article.cfm?itemid=15127&CFID=7810939&CFTOKEN=1519759
 
I contacted a company a few months ago about this. Sounded like a good deal to lease siting rights at $2,000 per year per unit. As it turned out they required an annual ave wind speed of 7 meters/sec and the ave for my property was only 4.3. If you have property that fits the criteria it would be a good venture. Provides income and is enviro friendly. With our addiction to foriegn oil it also has other obvious advantages.
 
It.
A blow hard like you should make millions
eek.gif
biggrin.gif
biggrin.gif
biggrin.gif
biggrin.gif
 
What a coincidence! I read the article and guessed the author, without having to click out the link. Molly Ivins. Red flag! Red flag! Red flag! She hates, loathes, and despises, Bush, Republicans, Capitalism, and the U.S. Constitution, not necessisarily in that order. So the article is really just the usual Ivins' Bash Bush diatribe, rather than anything objective. (You oughta read her articles on how she hates all gunowners. They're a riproaring lift from the Communist Manifesto!!)

That said, you boys and girls who are intersted in "wind power," better go down to Southern Kalifornia and get a gander at the real thing, before jumping in on the advice of Molly Ivins.

Talk about the ultimate "sound and sight" pollution, you gotta not only see those windmills, but LISTEN to it, up close and personal! 24 hours per day, 364 days per years, ad nauseum.

I've known people who literally were going crazy, having to live by a person who put up one of those monstrosities. They had to sell out at a loss, and move!

Been there an' done that, boys and girls, and you couldn't give me a windmill, on a whisky bet!

And all that snake oil salesman hype about you'll save so much money on electric bills, is nonsense... that is, unless you don't want to run your electrical appliances more than a few hours per week, interspersed with times of "brownout," and "blackout."

I suggest you talk with some actual "windmillies," before mkaing that kind of investment.

Just trying to help out around here......

L.W.
 
If you had a lot of wind, or no power at all, this may be semi practicle, but if you actually look at the over all costs of doing buisness, basic set up, batteries, maintanance over time, space taken......
Then look at your actual bill over a years time, I am guessing most bills don't average more or less then 12-15 hundred a year...
Now if you had a steady stream and sun light and added every thing together, you may be able to beat the electric companies, but then you have all the added cost of the hydro and the solar set ups and maintanace.
I think they have us by the short hairs no matter how you look at it...
wink.gif
 
There was a group that was looking a putting a tidal/wind combo out in bay in NE US, but the local greenweinies don't want those ugly things in their area.
That will be the trick to it all, finding a place to put the turbines where the poor folks with no clout live.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
111,156
Messages
1,949,199
Members
35,058
Latest member
idelkhntr13
Back
Top