Ten bears, step away from the whisky bottle...
Its really simple.
When I posted that I turned in 3 fat assed slugs riding an ATV behind a closed gate in Montana (on Plum Creek land)and cleary a PC gate (as per the sign), you said, "But if it was a Plum Creek gate or road it probably was open to ATV travel."
Are you following so far?
Which you were implying to mean, that I didnt know the use restrictions in my hunting areas in Montana or PC land use policy, and that the 3 stooges werent in violoation. Then, by chance an article appeared in the Missoulian a couple days later. In that article, that you apparently didnt read, it said that any PC gate is closed to YEARLONG mechanized travel, WHETHER OR NOT THE GATE IS OPEN. A road has to be clearly signed stating that its specifically open for mechanized use. The gate in question specifically states a yearlong closure, but even if no sign was present, the atvers would still be in violation.
Clearly, the fat butts where in violation, regardless of whether or not there was a sign on the road, which there was in this case.
Since then you've been your smart-assed self stating things like "dont break your arm patting yourself on the back", and continuing to argue about the status of PC land use restrictions in MT.
Your comment was wrong and misleading, you shot your mouth off when you should have listened. Something your good at.
Bottom line is I'm right, and your wrong, so were the 3 lard asses I turned in. Thats backed up by the signs and the PC land use policy, as well as the article I posted.
I dont care about campers, I didnt see any campers violating PC rules, I did see 3 atvers violating PC rules. I also dont give a shit about the picture IN IDAHO of the signs, its meaningless info for the issue at hand. Get it?
You are dense, and if your comprehension is typical of ATV riders, you're sunk.