Funny chit, well not really. If me helping other hunters is offensive, not sure what to say about that. If it is annoying to some, I suspect they will be even more annoyed going forward as with our YouTube channel giving us a lot more flexibility we never had with TV we are doing a lot of more of it.
I got the same grief when we promoted AZ the last two months, same as when I promoted MT as a great archery elk destination and people saw me hunting down by Hebgen Lake, when I promoted CO OTC elk hunting, when I promote pronghorn hunting in WY, when I started showing people how cheap you can hunt bears in southeast AK. This Region of Montana is over 14 million acres with over 4 million acres open to hunting and where non-residents are on a fixed quota for deer.
The business plan for this enterprise has as our "WHY" -
To promote self-guided public land hunting by sharing information and experiences that enhance advocacy for public lands and the hunting on those lands. That's why we do this. That has not changed since the plan was drawn up in 2008.
It probably wasn't a very good business plan, as it has yet to make any money. But at this point in my life, and my health, I don't really give damn. I will continue to do this. I want more public land hunters who will hopefully become public land advocates and I don't give a damn if they hunt as residents or non-residents. I don't give a damn if they hunt MT or AK, AZ or CO, ID or WY. All I care about is they go and hunt these lands and have a good experience. If one of them shoot a buck or bull I might have hoped to tag, good for them.
With the expanding platforms and growth we are experiencing the information stream is going to pick up, not slow down. Expect a lot more when we do our SE Alaska bear hunt as a YouTube exclusive in April. And when........
I find it peculiar that lowering the hurdles to help other hunters is such a bad idea. The criticism isn't only here on Hunt Talk.
View attachment 68886