Bonasababy
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 16, 2024
- Messages
- 1,456
It was an impossible situation for decision makers though.Here's my take on it - the data that was collected and presented by public health officials throughout Covid was generally (I'm sure there are exceptions) sound and the best that was available in real-time; however, the actions that were recommended and taken based on that data were often misguided. Pretty much everything is management of risk, and many officials went way too far on minimizing risk without considering the impacts. The public trust in those officials was lost, and rightly so. But the public trust in data, period, was also lost, and that has way more harmful ramifications.
Came down to the economy versus human lives. Early on so many forget how scary it was. Especially those in rural areas not plugged into --or not caring--what was going in more populated ones.
Just in my circle I had a sibling whose business was shut down--no fun, no problem understanding their reaction to that either--and a family friend, healthy, in their 50's, occupation put him in harms way with contact with people who refused to take precautions--who was killed by it. Guess which one came out Ok from that.
There are after the fact--which aren't completely helpful but do help illustrate the impact of choices--data showing states that were stricter had lower death rates. My state's leaders were trying to hit the balance--in hindsight even they have admitted they might have gone a bit too far in some respects, but they won't and should not apologize for making the best decision they could at the time, especially since after the fact data shows they did better than less restrictive states.