Originally posted by pawclaws:
ElkGunner; you inferred that I was telling lies, you insinuated that I was telling lies and you said that I was telling lies.
Paws,
I am still a bit confused, but based on the above answer;
#1 we can rule out that I called you a liar. Mr. Paws, would you agree?
#2 we can rule out that I am a Liar. Mr. Paws, would you agree?
3# therefore, we can surmize that ElkGunner is
NOT a liar, nor did he ever call Paws a Liar. Mr. Paws, would you agree?
#4 We can also agree that the remaining issues unclear are a.) if Paws lied and b.) if Paws called ElkGunner a Liar. Mr. Paws, would you agree?
I am really struggling, as I sit here scratching my head, to remember when and where I said you were telling lies. I have re-read thru all these posts, and I can't see a single inferrence, insinuation, or statement to the same.
I think Ithica probably has the best idea, as it is likely the easiest way for all of us to clear this up. And given that we have now gone more than 100 posts in this thread, uniting such adversaries as Moosie and 280, Nemont and Ithica, and Nut and I, it is obvious that the unwashed masses all want to see these inferrences, insinuations, and statements.
You wouldn't be making these up would you???
