I was able to catch most of the interview done by Rob Sexton of the U.S. Sportsmen's Alliance on the O'Reily Factor show and I thought that it was a little disappointing. What did you guys think?
To me it just seemed like Mr. Sexton did not give detailed enough answers to Mr. O'Reily. It seemed as if he was hung up on the heritage issue, which to me is a great point but the general public (non-hunters) can't relate to this point. O'Reily wanted him to justify how dog fighting is anymore cruel to animals than hunting. I felt he should have concentrated on the meat on the table issue, along with the biological reasons for hunting game animals and predators. To me this is what will click with the general public, as they need to understand that something must die for them to survive. It seemed as if he was a little unprepared for this interview.
This is just my opinion and I don't want to go any further but if you guys have some ideas, jump in and give another perspective.
To me it just seemed like Mr. Sexton did not give detailed enough answers to Mr. O'Reily. It seemed as if he was hung up on the heritage issue, which to me is a great point but the general public (non-hunters) can't relate to this point. O'Reily wanted him to justify how dog fighting is anymore cruel to animals than hunting. I felt he should have concentrated on the meat on the table issue, along with the biological reasons for hunting game animals and predators. To me this is what will click with the general public, as they need to understand that something must die for them to survive. It seemed as if he was a little unprepared for this interview.
This is just my opinion and I don't want to go any further but if you guys have some ideas, jump in and give another perspective.
