New threat to 2nd A?


“Don’t take your guns to town son…”

Johnny Cash, and now 47.
I’ve recently had that conversation with my son walks around with a pistol. He has the multi state concealed weapon license but that doesn’t seem to matter.
 
I didn’t say he didn’t have a right to carry. I was just wondering why he was on that particular day.
I didn't realize that we need a specific reason to be carrying a firearm. Maybe he went there to kill officers, but he didn't, he never had his gun in his hand. He was disarmed and then shot in the back. IMO that's all that really matters.
 
View attachment 399939
The tables can turn quickly!
I mean sort of.

My litmus test for whether or not someone or not is credible - did they maintain the same position with Rittenhouse as Pretti? Taking a gun to either place wasn't a great idea - but well within someone's rights.

There's a plethora of people making the point that Pretti was within his rights that were screeching about Rittenhouse.
 
if Trump was elected largely in part due to the promise of mass deportations and he was failing to conduct mass deportations, would he direct high profile, distracting, and divisive ICE raids to take the attention off of his failure to succeed in mass deportations of the illegal immigrants? And if so, how would that look different than what is currently happening?
 
There's a plethora of people making the point that Pretti was within his rights that were screeching about Rittenhouse.
I still see plenty of difference. Rittenhouse brandished his weapon and then killed two people. Nothing is absolute. One of the takeaways for me was that while I thought he wasn't completely innocent, I recognize that he went through our judicial system and was found not guilty. So that factors into the Pretti situation.

There's a difference between absolutism and consistency.
 
Epstein files now!!!

The Epstein files are no different than Waiting for Godot.

It will NEVER happen in this administration. It must be bad, but the decision is this bad, is better than the releasing the files bad.
 
I mean sort of.

My litmus test for whether or not someone or not is credible - did they maintain the same position with Rittenhouse as Pretti? Taking a gun to either place wasn't a great idea - but well within someone's rights.

There's a plethora of people making the point that Pretti was within his rights that were screeching about Rittenhouse.
I thought Rittenhouse was within his rights for the shooting. His mother needed her arse kicked for driving a minor to that situation. Bad parenting.
 
I still see plenty of difference. Rittenhouse brandished his weapon and then killed two people. Nothing is absolute. One of the takeaways for me was that while I thought he wasn't completely innocent, I recognize that he went through our judicial system and was found not guilty. So that factors into the Pretti situation.

There's a difference between absolutism and consistency.
Yes. Rittenhouse openly carried (brandishing?).

There's a number of differences in actions that took place against different parties. Lots to be argued about the nuance of both.

The disqualifier is simply "he shouldn't have brought a weapon" or "he was looking for trouble" is plain victim blaming and isn't respective to either of their rights. Absolutely - you're not intellectually honest if you don't see the consistency there.
 
Meanwhile, on the fraud front:

"Vic Hartman, a former FBI special agent and forensic accountant in Atlanta, said the DOJ’s white collar investigation divisions have been decimated under Trump. Skilled professionals are leaving in droves, and federal crime-fighting agencies are under-resourced."

"“If the government wants to deport their way out of this fraud problem, they may be on a path and [Department of Homeland Security] can do that,” Hartman said. But if the end goal is prosecuting the offenders, “they’re doing all the wrong things.”
 

Forum statistics

Threads
118,202
Messages
2,184,533
Members
38,470
Latest member
Touche
Back
Top