Ideas for inclusive conservation podcasts - Pattie Gonia

Mscarl (she/they)

New member
Joined
Nov 16, 2024
Messages
25
@Big Fin

The podcast team should book queer conservationist Pattie Gonia to discuss conservation and outdoor inclusivity topics. Organizations like Audobon Society and many more have incorporated PGs messaging to help increase inclusiveness of outdoor spaces and I believe the public land hunting community would benefit as well. Surveys and research has demonstrated that anywhere between 10 and 25% of young people identify as LGBT+ or some other form of non tradition gender identity. Incorporating messaging to this group of young people is not only imperative for future public land advocacy but as a valuable demographic in sales and marketing.

PG has been a vocal supporter of federal workers during this dark period for the agencies that are entrusted with our public lands. For instance, PG was an important part of the protest regarding the unjust termination of Shannon Joslin for expressing 1st amendment rights on public land

Thank you as I saw you voiced your support for the 1st amendment related to the fascist incidents in MN.

Pattie Gonia has received many awards related to conservation and been recognized by friend of conservation former Secretary of Interior Deb Haaland. Secretary Haaland is likely going to be the next governor of NM and has a close working relationship with another friend of conservation and queer ally, Senator Martin Heinrich. This is the only link friendly video US Interior Secretary Deb Haaland and PG without downloads. Also is a TED talk which may be found on your tube as well. Many other videos are available on PGs work related to public land, conservation, indigenous communities, climate change, and more.

There is no doubt a long list of beneficial topics that could discussed including inclusivity and diversity. The current administration wants to destroy both of those things in addition to the legacy of our public lands. What better way to help stop them and throw a monkey wrench in their plans by bringing together the incredible power of the public land and queer communities.



https://www.dailymail.co.uk/video/n...ag-queen-Pattie-Gonia-campaign-video-NYC.html
 
How did that work out for Bud Light?
I am not asking Randy to dress in drag and undertake a queer marketing campaign. I am suggesting that he have a discussion on his podcast with someone that has many things in common regarding public land and conservation and some different views. I am sure someone like Senator from Utah Mike Lee would be welcomed on the podcast if he wished to have such a discussion.

Pattie Gonia has already engaged with many prominent people and brands without issue. On the contrary, these meetings have been hugely successful. Furthermore, the message being promoted here is the same messaging of inclusivity that was promoted by the last administration. Public land for all. In contrast to the present administration that is trying to keep brown people from using public land.1769950669780.jpeg
 
I am not asking Randy to dress in drag and undertake a queer marketing campaign. I am suggesting that he have a discussion on his podcast with someone that has many things in common regarding public land and conservation and some different views. I am sure someone like Senator from Utah Mike Lee would be welcomed on the podcast if he wished to have such a discussion.

Pattie Gonia has already engaged with many prominent people and brands without issue. On the contrary, these meetings have been hugely successful. Furthermore, the message being promoted here is the same messaging of inclusivity that was promoted by the last administration. Public land for all. In contrast to the present administration that is trying to keep brown people from using public land.View attachment 400265
How is the administration trying to prevent brown people from accessing public land? Honest question, I’m not trying to be dismissive.
 
How is the administration trying to prevent brown people from accessing public land? Honest question, I’m not trying to be dismissive.
The evidence is overwhelming. Trump personally cancelled special holiday access to national parks on days like Martin Luther King Jr Day. A holiday many black and brown families used to enjoy public spaces free of cost. Also, this president has taken extraordinary steps to make sure all funding that may help conservation efforts directed at Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion are cancelled. I would wager many black, brown, and queer owned businesses especially in the outdoor spaces have suffered greatly.
 
The evidence is overwhelming. Trump personally cancelled special holiday access to national parks on days like Martin Luther King Jr Day. A holiday many black and brown families used to enjoy public spaces free of cost. Also, this president has taken extraordinary steps to make sure all funding that may help conservation efforts directed at Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion are cancelled. I would wager many black, brown, and queer owned businesses especially in the outdoor spaces have suffered greatly.
Cancelling a free national park day doesn’t discriminate, it applies to everyone. The rest of your argument is very vague and speculative. Do you have any specific examples? I cannot stand the current administration, but I think it hurts your argument when you make blanket statements that sound more like news headlines than fact based logic.

Here’s how I criticize the administration with concrete evidence. As you probably know they terminated thousands of probationary federal employees last year under the guise that probationary employees unskilled entry level workers. In reality, a federal worker becomes probationary many times in their career. For example, I personally know a former wildlife biologist who was terminated because he was a probationary employee. He had over 20 years of experience, but had recently moved into a supervisory position.
 
Cancelling a free national park day doesn’t discriminate, it applies to everyone. The rest of your argument is very vague and speculative. Do you have any specific examples? I cannot stand the current administration, but I think it hurts your argument when you make blanket statements that sound more like news headlines than fact based logic.

Here’s how I criticize the administration with concrete evidence. As you probably know they terminated thousands of probationary federal employees last year under the guise that probationary employees unskilled entry level workers. In reality, a federal worker becomes probationary many times in their career. For example, I personally know a former wildlife biologist who was terminated because he was a probationary employee. He had over 20 years of experience, but had recently moved into a supervisory position.

Cancelling all DEI programs and funding as well as cancelling free access on MLK day has nothing to do with it? Sorry I choose not to wear blinders.

My suggestion in this thread is about increasing inclusion and diversity not trying to stop it. Whether you think Trump and his people are doing it does not matter. Diversity and inclusion are what public lands are all about. Doing a podcast with a much larger conservation voice like Pattie Gonia would only serve to be beneficial. Reaching young people and different audience is a good idea. I am not asking for every podcast to do it. 1 podcast with a conservation voice with a huge reach compared to any hunting podcast out there. It is a suggestion worth considering.
 
Cancelling all DEI programs and funding as well as cancelling free access on MLK day has nothing to do with it? Sorry I choose not to wear blinders.

My suggestion in this thread is about increasing inclusion and diversity not trying to stop it. Whether you think Trump and his people are doing it does not matter. Diversity and inclusion are what public lands are all about. Doing a podcast with a much larger conservation voice like Pattie Gonia would only serve to be beneficial. Reaching young people and different audience is a good idea. I am not asking for every podcast to do it. 1 podcast with a conservation voice with a huge reach compared to any hunting podcast out there. It is a suggestion worth considering.
You still have not answered my question. How is the administration trying to prevent brown people from accessing public land? It is extremely easy to visit BLM land and National Forests. You literally just go there. It is also easy to visit a National Park or Wildlife Refuge. You show up and pay a fee. That covers the 4 main federal land management agencies. So what am I missing?
 
I will give you one talking point. There is a lot of recreational opportunity on federal land on military bases, which can only be accessed by military personnel, their families, or DOD employees. You can definitely argue that Pete Hegseth is discouraging LGBT and minorities from being in the military, therefore reducing their access to that land. I don’t think that is his concern in his actions but that is a consequence.
 
Cancelling all DEI programs and funding as well as cancelling free access on MLK day has nothing to do with it? Sorry I choose not to wear blinders.

My suggestion in this thread is about increasing inclusion and diversity not trying to stop it. Whether you think Trump and his people are doing it does not matter. Diversity and inclusion are what public lands are all about. Doing a podcast with a much larger conservation voice like Pattie Gonia would only serve to be beneficial. Reaching young people and different audience is a good idea. I am not asking for every podcast to do it. 1 podcast with a conservation voice with a huge reach compared to any hunting podcast out there. It is a suggestion worth considering.
Have you been to a trailhead in Colorado? Majority of the vehicles have some form of diversity sticker on them. The diversity stickers to American flag stickers or trump stickers in Colorado is probably 98 - 2
 
I see no need for any such programs. ALL people can enjoy public lands whether they are straight, gay, bi, black, brown, yellow or white. Just go. Nobody is keeping anyone out. What I would like to see is less DEMAND to be included or prioritized. No group is any more special than any other. Stop acting like it. Just get it out and enjoy whatever piece you want to.
 
This is the suggestion sub forum. I am making a suggestion. One of Randy Newberg's most liked posts I have found was regarding a commitment to diversity after his Hunters of Color Podcast. I was under the assumption based on that podcast, statement, and number of likes that increasing diversity was a pursuit forum membership was interested in.

I will give you one talking point. There is a lot of recreational opportunity on federal land on military bases, which can only be accessed by military personnel, their families, or DOD employees. You can definitely argue that Pete Hegseth is discouraging LGBT and minorities from being in the military, therefore reducing their access to that land. I don’t think that is his concern in his actions but that is a consequence.
Thank you and I realize that I came off as brash with a comment about blinders. We disagree on Trump. I think many people would benefit from a podcast from a different perspective.

Have you been to a trailhead in Colorado? Majority of the vehicles have some form of diversity sticker on them. The diversity stickers to American flag stickers or trump stickers in Colorado is probably 98 - 2


I do not know if your numbers are correct but I know the outdoor community is represented well, but not the hunting community. I have known several closeted hunters from CO. I think people would be surprised how many people choose not to disclose their lifestyle to others. In many cases, coming out is a matter of losing family or a job. Sometimes it is a matter of life and death. As a deeply closed member of the community, I fear for my safety, job, and personal relationships so I take steps to remain closeted.
 
This is the suggestion sub forum. I am making a suggestion. One of Randy Newberg's most liked posts I have found was regarding a commitment to diversity after his Hunters of Color Podcast. I was under the assumption based on that podcast, statement, and number of likes that increasing diversity was a pursuit forum membership was interested in.


Thank you and I realize that I came off as brash with a comment about blinders. We disagree on Trump. I think many people would benefit from a podcast from a different perspective.




I do not know if your numbers are correct but I know the outdoor community is represented well, but not the hunting community. I have known several closeted hunters from CO. I think people would be surprised how many people choose not to disclose their lifestyle to others. In many cases, coming out is a matter of losing family or a job. Sometimes it is a matter of life and death. As a deeply closed member of the community, I fear for my safety, job, and personal relationships so I take steps to remain closeted.
First off, I’m sorry that you have to deal with those issues. Nobody in this country should fear for their safety and well being based on their personal choices. I think a lot of people here have similar opinions on LGBT rights as I do. It’s similar to how I view coyote hunting. Coyote hunting has no appeal to me and it’s something that basically doesn’t exist in my world. I don’t give it any thought. But if other people like hunting coyotes then good for them and I wish them success. I was taught in college that to build a strong argument you need to be critical of your position to weed out the weak points. I have been critical of part of your position to try and demonstrate that to you. Here’s one more issue I thought of where you might relate to people on this forum. I have heard some people suggest that transgenderism is a mental disability and should be grounds for denying someone their second amendment rights. This group on hunt talk is generally against restricting second amendment rights for almost anyone.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
118,267
Messages
2,187,188
Members
38,503
Latest member
Loganhack
Back
Top