Gratis Tags

Candiru

Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2022
Messages
43
There are units where the number of gratis applicants exceeds the number of gratis tags and regular hunters have no chance to get a tag. These units are on the eastern side of the state. Any solutions? Does this cause more competition elsewhere?

 
Stop shooting does would be a start …. If the populations are that bad why are they still selling doe tags. Also maybe it’s time to talk more about a 1 tag system .
How they still have leftover doe tags anywhere is beyond me. There's a unit by me that has terrible deer numbers (like most of the state), but had a few hundred leftover doe tags available.
 
How they still have leftover doe tags anywhere is beyond me. There's a unit by me that has terrible deer numbers (like most of the state), but had a few hundred leftover doe tags available.
Maybe shifting baseline perspectives? I’ve never hunted NoDak but have been putting in for several years. Everyone says it’s deer paradise compared to Montana. But then guys still driving all over nation to hunt Montana. It’s hard to convince people things can be better if they haven’t seen/experienced what better is.
 
Maybe shifting baseline perspectives? I’ve never hunted NoDak but have been putting in for several years. Everyone says it’s deer paradise compared to Montana. But then guys still driving all over nation to hunt Montana. It’s hard to convince people things can be better if they haven’t seen/experienced what better is.

Have a buddy with an elk tag for ND that I’ve been going over on the weekends to help with. Have seen 4 different bucks that would go over 180”. It’s been years in Montana that I’ve seen 4 bucks push 180”.
 
Have a buddy with an elk tag for ND that I’ve been going over on the weekends to help with. Have seen 4 different bucks that would go over 180”. It’s been years in Montana that I’ve seen 4 bucks push 180”.
Are these all on public?
 
In Montana it’s only a percentage or certain number of tags. Example of a special elk unit: 120 tags available and like 25 are set aside for landowner and those are drawn from a separate applicant pool. Would this be a solution?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2113.jpeg
    IMG_2113.jpeg
    425 KB · Views: 2
In Montana it’s only a percentage or certain number of tags. Example of a special elk unit: 120 tags available and like 25 are set aside for landowner and those are drawn from a separate applicant pool. Would this be a solution?
The issue in ND is that its 93% private land. It's a fine line for the game and fish and legislature to have opportunity for non- land owners to draw tags, while not pissing off land owners and reducing gratis tags. even though the animals don't belong to the land owners, they're mostly on private land. We rely very heavily on being able to get permission to hunt private. That's why i think the only real solution is more habitat, then more animals/tags will follow.
 
The issue in ND is that its 93% private land. It's a fine line for the game and fish and legislature to have opportunity for non- land owners to draw tags, while not pissing off land owners and reducing gratis tags. even though the animals don't belong to the land owners, they're mostly on private land. We rely very heavily on being able to get permission to hunt private. That's why i think the only real solution is more habitat, then more animals/tags will follow.
93% private but there is a lot of private land you can hunt so it is a little deceiving. However, I would venture to guess that a lot of the prime deer bottom land ground is private that is posted. Seemed that way in the SW corner where I just was. Did see some really nice bucks on public though just across the border in SD.
 
The gratis tags in North Dakota are 100% bull$hit.

Landowners don’t own the animals, the state does. The landowners should feel lucky they have been allowed to rape the system for tags as long as they have….
 
Back
Top