Overly simplistic.
I don't disagree with more cutting on NF lands at all, what I went to school for and absolutely trees are renewable.
Its just flat not true that 80% of NF lands should have been logged 30 years ago, many weren't rotation age then, many still aren't today. You live in the south where trees grow at least twice, if not 3 times faster than our best sites in the Interior West.
The other problem is, nobody is bidding on sales now. The guy I rent my house to is a forester for the local district. He put 2 sales up last year and received....exactly....zero bids. He's going to try running them again this year.
Lots of reasons for that, markets, imports, distance to mills, fuel prices, blah blah blah blah.
While this new idea sounds good on the surface, its just flat not going to happen. For one thing, the administration is at best going to be 4 years. Not sure how many timber sales you've prepped, but I'll just let you know that they don't happen over night. Of course, then there's the little self-induced staffing problem that we have going on, the firing of foresters, likely some early retirement authority causing a lot of institutional knowledge of things like timber, heading out the door.
Anyone want to talk about where the funding is going to come from to administer the sales? Build roads? Required cruising? Marking sales? Boundaries? Site prep/burning after the sales?
There's also the question of how you get sales purchased, like I said, many are not getting bids. If they do get bids, where's the profit in hauling logs hundreds of miles to the nearest mills that still remain when diesel is 3.50/gallon?
With a flood of domestic timber, its no different than a flood of domestic oil, price will go through the gdman floor and make sales even less attractive and tighter profit margins for mills.
I got news, this is going nowhere...unfortunately.