Some of the Type 4 harvest odds are north of 80% whereas Type 6 odds are sometimes lower. Type 4 is almost x3 as expensive when you factor in points, but more predictable when you draw because of the points. Tons of other factors on which is the “best.” Many state’s cow tags are fairly equitable to WY Type 4.
Personally, there are many other cow tags I’d prefer over this one, despite being able to just show up and find them quickly.
By far the most valuable thing I learned about elk on this hunt is a MUCH better understanding of how to apply elk’s 4 basic needs to a particular herd and unit, based on things like pressure, nutrition, human impact and interactions, water variability, etc. I asked the biologist: “I expect to see cows in places A, B, and C for reasons A-E. How close am I?” He graciously explained how I was mostly wrong, and then told me I’d be likely to find them in places D, E, F and rattled off many reasons WHY they are there, and then went on to explain many reasons why they were not elsewhere in the unit. This conversation was invaluable to understanding elk a whole lot better than I did before. 5 hours of e-scouting, one 10-minute conversation with the biologist, and then a half day with boots on the ground probably advanced my elk knowledge from 5/100 to 15/100.
There are about 500 post hunt cow elk in units 30-32, which is roughly 1400 miles sq, or one cow every 2.8 miles sq. Helps to know where to look and why.
For comparison, there are 25 WT does per square mile where I live. I think a lot of Eastern WT hunters kind of have a paradigm shift when they discover the differences.