Wyodeerhunter, IndianLarry-
How did the meeting go? I didn't even hear bout it till you guys called me and woke my ass up. Did you place votes? Hear anything good?
Did the "greenies" or the SFW nazis get the slots??
Posting here cuz i don't want to sort through 10 million drama ridden posts on the "other" website to see what went down.
For the benefit of those not in state.
The Fish and Wildlife Advisory committee is voting to fill slots tonight.
SFW and APHA push some candidates pretty hard. While many people strongly oppose any candidate recommended by either of those organizations because they have a somewhat rational fear that Alaska will turn into (even more so) a non resident hunters paradise. Many feel that SFW is too political to be making decisions regarding our hunting opportunities. Every candidate not blessed with the holy SFW water is labeled as a "greenie" no matter their stance.
I try to keep a level mind and learn as much about each of the candidates as possible normally, and vote accordingly. however I myself was behind the curve on knowing about this meeting.
These meetings and others similar (Board of Game meetings, USFS land use meetings, timber sales, etc) are always hotly contested and while boring for the most part, sometimes the lava and tempers overflow and things get interesting.
Anyway, WDH and IL-- post up here and let us know what you thought of the process and what you think of the new candidates or old candidates if they got re-elected. Much appreciated guys!
How did the meeting go? I didn't even hear bout it till you guys called me and woke my ass up. Did you place votes? Hear anything good?
Did the "greenies" or the SFW nazis get the slots??
Posting here cuz i don't want to sort through 10 million drama ridden posts on the "other" website to see what went down.
For the benefit of those not in state.
The Fish and Wildlife Advisory committee is voting to fill slots tonight.
SFW and APHA push some candidates pretty hard. While many people strongly oppose any candidate recommended by either of those organizations because they have a somewhat rational fear that Alaska will turn into (even more so) a non resident hunters paradise. Many feel that SFW is too political to be making decisions regarding our hunting opportunities. Every candidate not blessed with the holy SFW water is labeled as a "greenie" no matter their stance.
I try to keep a level mind and learn as much about each of the candidates as possible normally, and vote accordingly. however I myself was behind the curve on knowing about this meeting.
These meetings and others similar (Board of Game meetings, USFS land use meetings, timber sales, etc) are always hotly contested and while boring for the most part, sometimes the lava and tempers overflow and things get interesting.
Anyway, WDH and IL-- post up here and let us know what you thought of the process and what you think of the new candidates or old candidates if they got re-elected. Much appreciated guys!
Last edited: