7mm PRC do all bullet?

[Elkmagnet]

Interesting. I would have thought that a heavy for caliber mono would have caused less damage than a faster, smaller caliber bullet, even on a shoulder shot. My experience with the monos has been that they don’t impart as much shock disruption as I like. The LRXs are supposed to open more easily and rapidly and probably provide more of that tissue disruption.

I guess "less" is a relative term. I would like to see a picture of the wound It probably did cause less than some others.

 

[mtmuley]

So funny. I posted a Pic of a little .243 I have in the optics forum. Nasty little rifle. With a couple different bullets. mtmuley

 

[The_Coloradoboy]

Although the accubond is ballistically “boring” it’s tried, true and proven. As much as I tinker with and shoot the high bc bullets like Berger and hornadys. If I could only have one bullet for the rest of time to hunt with it would be a nosler accubond

 

[brendog84cj8]

Not PRC but 160 accubond is deadly out of my 7mm rem mag.

 

[Robert N]

View attachment 399945

180eldm blood shot the entrance side of my bull from neck to tail on a 325yd high shoulder shot.

That’s a Kill.

 

[130gr]

Big fan of the Barnes LRX family. Have used both the 129gr LRX in 270 win, and the 160gr and 168gr LRX for my 7mmPRC with great results on a variety of species. I will say that the 160gr LRX is my favorite.

 

[Benfromalbuquerque]

Many will work fine.

That’s right! Enough hits from any caliber will work.