Use Promo Code Randy for 20% off OutdoorClass

Wolves In Illinois

Ithaca 37

New member
Joined
Mar 4, 2001
Messages
5,427
Location
Home of the free, Land of the brave
After 100 years, wolf confirmed in Illinois
BY JEFF LAMPE
COPLEY NEWS SERVICE

HENRY - The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ended seven months of speculation Thursday by confirming a canine killed last winter in Marshall County was a gray wolf.

It is believed to be the first confirmation of a wild wolf in Illinois since the early 1900s, though records on the matter are incomplete.

What's no longer in doubt is the origin of the 92-pound wolf Randy Worker shot while hunting west of Henry on Dec. 29.

"The DNA exam confirms the wolf originated from the Great Lakes pack, either in Minnesota, Wisconsin or Michigan," said Tim Santel, a special agent for the Fish and Wildlife Service. "We can say from the morphological and genetic characteristics it had to be from one of those populations."

Agents delayed releasing test results pending completion of an investigation.

Gray wolves - also known as timber wolves - have slowly increased in numbers in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan since being listed as a federally endangered species in 1974. And though wolves were downgraded to threatened this spring, they still are protected under federal law.

As a result, individuals who kill a wolf can face criminal charges of up to $250,000 and five years in prison.

Worker's case is unique because wolves were not believed present in Illinois.

"At this time, there haven't been any charges filed," Santel said.

That's a relief for Worker, a Henry resident who thought he was shooting at a coyote.

"I couldn't tell the difference when I looked at it through my field glasses or through my rifle scope," he said.

Worker, now known as "Wolfman" to friends and associates, said he's glad to finally have a definitive answer for the many inquiries he fields daily.

"I had two farmers ask me about it this morning," said Worker, who drives a truck for Gill Grain Co. "Now I can tell them it was a wolf."

Actually, it is the third Great Lakes wolf to wander well south of its home range in the past two years. All three may have spent time in Illinois.

In 2001 a wolf that had been fitted with a radio collar in

Michigan was shot in northeastern Missouri. On June 23, biologists found a wolf in east- central Indiana that had been born in Wisconsin and traveled more than 400 miles before it was killed, apparently by an automobile.

Biologists believe those wolves dispersed from their packs after reaching adulthood.

"Dispersal can happen any time but is most common in the fall or winter prior to the February breeding season," said Adrian Wydeven, a wolf specialist for Wisconsin's Department of Natural Resources.

Recognizing the increased possibility of wolves migrating south, state and federal agencies are planning to start educational programs for hunters.

"There's going to be a push by the Service and the DNRs for Indiana, Illinois and possibly Missouri to do a proactive approach in educating the hunters to be more cognizant of what're shooting at," Santel said. "Hopefully by educating them we won't have to worry about investigating them."

Experts also stress there's no need for panic.

"There has never been a documented case of a healthy, wild wolf killing a person in North America," said Jen Westlund, program director for the Minnesota-based International Wolf Center. "There have been people killed by captive animals and there were two cases in (Canada's) Algonquin Provincial Park where campers were bitten by wolves."

Westlund said in both those cases the wolves were accustomed to receiving food from humans and had lost their instinctive fear of man.
http://www.lincolncourier.com/news/03/07/25/c.asp
 
Wrong.

The bones of his friend lay scattered in the snow. Three wolves lay dead.
http://www.natureswolves.com/human/aws_wolfattacks.htm

And this is a Wolf LOVER site. Of course they go on to dismiss it due to scientific evidence.
here's the excerpt explaining that "Those requirements for "documentation" negate all historical records!

As with rabid wolves, the biologist can say, "There are no "documented" cases of wild healthy wolves attacking humans." In order to be "documented" these unreasonable criteria must be met

The wolf has to be killed, examined and found to be healthy.
It must be proven that the wolf was never kept in captivity in its entire life.
There must be eyewitnesses to the attack.
The person must die from their wounds (bites are generally not attacks according to the biologists)
That is a "documented" attack."

read the whole artical especially the part about why so many attacks in Asia and so few in North America.

I say let the populations grow, get them delisted, and let the People see how cute and fuzzy they are. Then my bet is eradication will happen

<FONT COLOR="#800080" SIZE="1">[ 08-02-2003 07:56: Message edited by: MarlandS ]</font>
 
Let's say for a minute that HEALTHY WOLVES do not attack humans. OK all is well and good.
What's to keep one from getting, say, an absessed tooth? Irritable and hungry, the risk arises. What if the individual with the bad tooth is the Alpha male? Would the pack follow?

What will stop cross-breeding? A wild hybrid is a documented dangerous creature.

Some claim the few healthy wolf bites (remember the criteria for an attack) was due to surprising the wolf or enroaching on a kill or too close to pups. Ok I'll believe that for the sake of arguement. With increased numbers of wolves in higher population areas won't surprises be more common?

Some say that the wolves will not dessimate the ungulate herds, probably not, since as they say "natural balance" will be restored.
Ok well it seems to me that when there was a "natural balance" man was barely a factor in herd control, how much hunting of the preferred prey species will remain in say, 30 years? Or will the radical eco weenies have their wish and hunting no longer be deemed "necessary" for their population control?

The issue of familiarity , won't increased wolf populations added to the population density equate to increased familiarity especially when the factor of a wolf's range comes into play?

<FONT COLOR="#800080" SIZE="1">[ 08-02-2003 08:37: Message edited by: MarlandS ]</font>
 
Marland, Good find! Thanks.
smile.gif
 
Marland,

Natureswolves.com is put together by Tim Sundles, and he is definately not a wolf lover. I'm suprised the all knowing IT didn't pick up on this. Just more proof that IT doesn't know jack shit!

Paul
 

Forum statistics

Threads
111,224
Messages
1,951,613
Members
35,086
Latest member
dwaller4449
Back
Top