Straight Arrow
Well-known member
Disagree ... my Mom lived fairly active, healthy life to 101 yrs old. She never trained in a gym in her life.Just living an active lifestyle probably won’t be enough.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Disagree ... my Mom lived fairly active, healthy life to 101 yrs old. She never trained in a gym in her life.Just living an active lifestyle probably won’t be enough.
I think those are all good goals. I could do some, but not others. I think there’s probably some virtue having a goal around squatting. It’s cliché, but it’s the one associated with getting up off of a lot of things - like a toilet. Because you will lose muscle at some rate by the time you achieve some age, it would be good to have as much as you can by the time you reach that age. Not sure what that benchmark would be.
One I think about is BMI/body fat percentage. Though BMI is imperfect, and I’d have to dig up the studies, it seems to be a fact that there’s just no such thing as a fat person that’s in shape insofar is they are sitting themselves up for longevity. There are tubs who could achieve many of the things on that list, but statistically they are still at risk for a lot of the complications of older age if they are carrying around too much weight.
Aside from nutrition being on point,I used to think that just being active and living an active life would kind of take care of itself for someone’s fitness. A couple older guys on the fire department, one of which is in his mid 70s still cut multiple cords of wood a week and sells them. Just a savage. But an outlier who’s also on his 3rd knee.
What I’m getting at is that if you want to maintain those practical fitness goals in the spirit of living better longer, I think you have to pointedly train in the gym. Lift weights, do cardio, etc. Just living an active lifestyle probably won’t be enough.
I’m not saying it’s a bad thing, it’s good and is absolutely important, but I think one is leaving a lot on the table by assuming that just hiking, wood cutting, etc will make up the difference of actually going to the gym in terms of maintaining muscle mass.Disagree ... my Mom lived fairly active, healthy life to 101 yrs old. She never trained in a gym in her life.
I’m not saying it’s a bad thing, it’s good and is absolutely important, but I think one is leaving a lot on the table by assuming that just hiking, wood cutting, etc will make up the difference of actually going to the gym in terms of maintaining muscle mass.
A person WILL lose significant muscle mass, unless they work hard to hold on to it.
Anyone who can float can backstroke a mileSwimming a mile seems a little crazy, but can get on board with the rest of them
Just living an active lifestyle probably won’t be enough.
I think we really discount how sedentary our lives have become. Just stay at a holiday inn and watch how many people use the elevator instead of walking up 1 flight of stairs to get to their room.Disagree ... my Mom lived fairly active, healthy life to 101 yrs old. She never trained in a gym in her life.
Agreed. I think there are three pillars of health and longevity:
1) Nutrition/diet
2) fitness and activity
3) sleep
And, if you ask me, the only one of those that has some negotiating room is fitness and activity. I just simply believe there is no way to be optimally healthy without good diet and good sleep; you can’t outrun either of those.
Anyone who can float can backstroke a mile
The goals are great and it can be a great way to measure to keep you healthy but if you start training for those I feel like you won’t accomplish much to adding to actual health.
I’ve thought about having test days were every couple months I do x amount of workouts and see if I went up or down