She entered under the U4U humanitarian parole program.
Her two year parole is close to expiring. Her request to re-enroll for another two year parole hinges on no considerable issues rising from her time in the U.S.. This is a requirement for anyone under a humanitarian parole. A legitimate international custodial battle would be an, "issue".
My guess, her only option, no matter how Longshot a chance, was to request U.S. District Court rule in her favor for herself and her daughter to clear the opportunity to re-enroll and remain another two years.
It was a stretch however she had to try...
Regardless, w/ the ruling and her parole time frame, she's faced with returning to Ukraine.
Now? Desperation settles in as Malloy ruled against her. Likely her sponsoring friend that petitioned for her U4U is the $$$ winner that paid for her legal fees in U.S. now? Desperation sets in further.
Feed a subjective journalist to exagerate and play the ASPCA themed, desperation public plea.
Life.