FS supports developing piblic land

Several sites around the Snowies that the FS already has cabins on could be great housing if families want to live pretty remote.
Work stations too for that matter.
They already have private leases for cabins why not build housing for workers?
 
My sister spent years in USFS housing in Alaska and Idaho. Seasonal and field personnel should have housing close to the SO or their reporting point. My only question is who will be in this housing.

If they are going to say that a GS-14/GS-15 or SES Forest Supervisor can't afford a house, I will throw the BS flag.
 
Several sites around the Snowies that the FS already has cabins on could be great housing if families want to live pretty remote.
Work stations too for that matter.
They already have private leases for cabins why not build housing for workers?
i dont work in gov, so i havent lost all common sense, but maybe NOT have offices in one of the most expensive zip codes in the country?

Further, explain how this would be different than what Miike Lee is pushig for?
 
Several sites around the Snowies that the FS already has cabins on could be great housing if families want to live pretty remote.
Work stations too for that matter.
They already have private leases for cabins why not build housing for workers?
Someone from Wyoming should have a better realization of the difficulty in residing in the snowy, oft inaccessible backcountry where most USFS cabins are located. It's a tough trip through paradise to Walmart! Even fed workers have to eat.
 
The sites I'm talking about are along the highway, just get in and drive to town.
Many folks live very remotely in Wyoming, getting to the store twice a month maybe.
I understand well the challenges to living remotely, maybe you do not??
Where did I say backcountry cabins? Many of the leases around here have highway access as well.
 
i dont work in gov, so i havent lost all common sense, but maybe NOT have offices in one of the most expensive zip codes in the country?

Further, explain how this would be different than what Miike Lee is pushig for?
So, where do you want USFS managers to live on the BT? It makes no sense to have an S.O. in the middle of nowhere, not effective or efficient for the workers or the public.

Its been discussed ad nauseum to move the SO out of Jackson, not many alternatives and all are still expensive.

Sometimes you just have to suck it up, the work still needs to be done and providing housing is the only way it will work. That is, unless you're good with paying seasonal trail crews 300K a year.
 
So, where do you want USFS managers to live on the BT? It makes no sense to have an S.O. in the middle of nowhere, not effective or efficient for the workers or the public.

Its been discussed ad nauseum to move the SO out of Jackson, not many alternatives and all are still expensive.

Sometimes you just have to suck it up, the work still needs to be done and providing housing is the only way it will work. That is, unless you're good with paying seasonal trail crews 300K a year.

your inventory guys seem to be fine in trailers,

in the real world, when we've worked up there, we dont house dudes in Jackson, but mainly because we have forethought.

And no. No one believes Freedom costs tge same as Jackson. Thats usual Gov mismanagement at its finest.

I was told public land in public hands was tge goal.....
 
So, where do you want USFS managers to live on the BT? It makes no sense to have an S.O. in the middle of nowhere, not effective or efficient for the workers or the public.

Its been discussed ad nauseum to move the SO out of Jackson, not many alternatives and all are still expensive.
Just buy some of the dirt cheap land in Alpine or Pinedale.
 
According to AI , commercial property in Jackson is about $2millionan acre.

Freedom is $40k for land.

im no gov accountant, but how many prefab houses can you build by selking Jackson land? and......you dont have to develop a single public acre.?

Being good stewards of tax dollars is a thing
 
your inventory guys seem to be fine in trailers,

in the real world, when we've worked up there, we dont house dudes in Jackson, but mainly because we have forethought.

And no. No one believes Freedom costs tge same as Jackson. Thats usual Gov mismanagement at its finest.

I was told public land in public hands was tge goal.....
Right, and you dont have to deal with the millions of the American public that go through Jackson on their way to Teton and YNP and utilize the BT enroute. That gateway alone makes total sense for the SO to be in Jackson. Not to mention the need for the BT to work with NPS, GF, etc.

In case you were wondering that part of Wyoming has lots of issues, concerns, and is high profile.

I know let's move the SO to Cokeville...cheap land there and so efficient.
 
You might want to let Congress know that. The FS budget isnt even a rounding error.

Thats a great attitude...f the piblic, cuz another department is. Hard
Right, and you dont have to deal with the millions of the American public that go through Jackson on their way to Teton and YNP and utilize the BT enroute. That gateway alone makes total sense for the SO to be in Jackson. Not to mention the need for the BT to work with NPS, GF, etc.

In case you were wondering that part of Wyoming has lots of issues, concerns, and is high profile.

I know let's move the SO to Cokeville...cheap land there and so efficient.

Damnest thing. The Wuhan flu came and tge FS somehow figured a way to not have to be in office, let alone in Jackson Hole. So... what other gov agencies shall we start pouring foundations for on pubic? And where shall we stop? Park City? Sun Valley? Tahoe?

This may shock you, but lots of folks deal with commutes, generally because where they can live, and where buisness is, arent the same neighborhood, FS isnt special.
 
Back
Top