Cass Sunstein to serve as the head of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affair

[aj7873]

:W::W::W::W:Well the Govt is looking to make us all Non Hunters

Subject: Cass Sunstein - Debate on "Regulatory Czar" Ended By U.S. Senate
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 08:00:30 -0400
To:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Greg R. Lawson (614) 888-4868 x 214
September 9, 2009 Sharon Hayden (614) 888-4868 x 226
Debate on “Regulatory Czar” Ended By U.S. Senate
Vote Held Despite Senator’s Attempt to Put Hold on Nomination
(Columbus) – Tonight the U.S. Senate voted to end debate on the nomination of one of the most outspoken animal rights, anti-hunting, and anti- Second Amendment individuals to a high government position. By a 63-35 vote, only five votes short of what was needed to block the appointment, debate stopped on the nomination of Cass Sunstein to serve as the head of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA).
Of the 63 senators that voted in favor of Sunstein, an anti-hunter, 22 were members of the Congressional Sportsmen’s Caucus, or 42 percent.
The vote was held despite the efforts of Senator Johnny Isakson (R- GA) to place a “hold” on the nomination of Sunstein.
The U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance (USSA) and the National Wild Turkey Federation (NWTF) made this confirmation fight a top priority. These efforts were also aided by many conservation groups from around the nation such as: National Shooting Sports Foundation, Masters of Foxhounds Association of North America, Fur Takers of America, National Trappers’ Association, Conservation Force, Shikar Safari Club, Mule Deer Foundation, Delta Water Fowl Foundation, Pope and Young Club, Dallas Safari Club, Whitetails Unlimited, Inc., Houston Safari Club, Texas Wildlife Association, and the Wild Sheep Foundation.
The efforts of those groups and many others were instrumental in persuading Sen. Isakson to attempt placing a “hold” on Sunstein.
“We are disappointed with the outcome of tonight’s vote, especially that so many members of the Senate claiming to be pro-sportsman voted in favor of a nominee who has expressed that recreational hunting could be banned,” stated USSA President and CEO Bud Pidgeon. “Nonetheless, the USSA and our partners had an obligation to fight this appointment. Sportsmen all across America will clearly be able to see which senators, along with Sen. Isakson, were willing to stand up for them.”
The USSA and others argued for weeks that Sunstein’s views on giving animals standing in court and banning recreational hunting would pose an intolerable threat to sportsmen given the critical position the OIRA has in the implementation of all federal rules.
Click Here for a full list of how senators voted.

REMEMBER THOSE WHO VOTED YEA, ESPECIALLY THOSE ON THE CSC, ON ELECTION DAY!!

 

[TOM IN TENNESSEE]

Perhaps some of you politically astute can explain why only 35 votes , including two Democrats, were cast to oppose Cloture but 40 votes (enough to deafeat cloture) were cast opposing Sunstein in the "up or down" vote???? Surely we don't have any politicians who will claim to have had it both ways!?!?!? Surely !!