A 788 or a 700? Lots of people are scared of Remingtons. I'm not one of them. mtmuleyNot me, my 308 had a faulty safety. One of many. Ugly, deadly, and unpredictably dangerous, sounds kind of like a feral pig. It soured me on Remingtons.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A 788 or a 700? Lots of people are scared of Remingtons. I'm not one of them. mtmuleyNot me, my 308 had a faulty safety. One of many. Ugly, deadly, and unpredictably dangerous, sounds kind of like a feral pig. It soured me on Remingtons.
Me neither!A 788 or a 700? Lots of people are scared of Remingtons. I'm not one of them. mtmuley
Its best to install a trimney trigger, it will resolve issues.Not me, my 308 had a faulty safety. One of many. Ugly, deadly, and unpredictably dangerous, sounds kind of like a feral pig. It soured me on Remingtons.
A good smith that knows Remingtons can tune up a Walker trigger. mtmuleyIts best to install a trimney trigger, it will resolve issues.
Its best to install a trimney trigger, it will resolve issues.
Yes they can, but the Walker design will never be safe. Having said that, the 788 did not have a Walker trigger.A good smith that knows Remingtons can tune up a Walker trigger. mtmuley
I know the 788 is a totally different trigger. We can disagree on the Walker. mtmuleyYes they can, but the Walker design will never be safe. Having said that, the 788 did not have a Walker trigger.
In this day of safe aftermarket triggers it's utter foolishness to keep a Walker trigger on a 700.
I helped Rich Barber some with his Remington Lawsuit back in the early 2000's and read piles of classified Remington internal documents, including Mike Walker's court sealed testimony. In his testimony Walker stated he pleaded with Remington to not use his trigger, calling it completely unsafe. Internal Remington testing showed this to be the case. The volumes of what I read was absolutely chilling, as was Remington's wanton disregard for public safety. Per firearm it was $0.12 cheaper to stick with the Walker trigger, even though Remington's internal documents showed they absolutely knew they had a dangerous design. They calculated it was cheaper to settle lawsuits than change, and the internal documents showed this to be their reasoning.I know the 788 is a totally different trigger. We can disagree on the Walker. mtmuley
Old news. And yeah, I'll use what I want. Thanks. mtmuleyI helped Rich Barber some with his Remington Lawsuit back in the early 2000's and read piles of classified Remington internal documents, including Mike Walker's court sealed testimony. In his testimony Walker stated he pleaded with Remington to not use his trigger, calling it completely unsafe. Internal Remington testing showed this to be the case. The volumes of what I read was absolutely chilling, as was Remington's wanton disregard for public safety. Per firearm it was $0.12 cheaper to stick with the Walker trigger, even though Remington's internal documents showed they absolutely knew they had a dangerous design. The calculated it was cheaper to settle lawsuits than change, and the internal documents showed this to be their reasoning.
Keep using your Walker triggers, even though Mike Walker himself wouldn't use them...
Gravity is still real even though it's "old news." But suit yourself...Old news. And yeah, I'll use what I want. Thanks. mtmuley
Thanks again. mtmuleyGravity is still real even though it's "old news." But suit yourself...
Per firearm it was $0.12 cheaper to stick with the Walker trigger, even though Remington's internal documents showed they absolutely knew they had a dangerous design. They calculated it was cheaper to settle lawsuits than change, and the internal documents showed this to be their reasoning.
I should never have brought it up. mtmuleySounds like the Ford Pinto situation. Cost benefit analysis.
That is 100% what it was.Sounds like the Ford Pinto situation. Cost benefit analysis.