Search results for query: *

  1. S

    “Protecting access for hunters and anglers act”

    Not migratory game birds. I'm not sure where you are going with this argument. Are you in support of the bill?
  2. S

    “Protecting access for hunters and anglers act”

    Waterfowl, et al,cross state and country lines. That’s how that lead rule came to be. With science research showing the negative effects of lead ingestion, of course.
  3. S

    Nope smokers not allowed

    They will reject the prosecution, which I would support. The case is weak and we all know the questions on that doc and the various state rules on firearm ownership are ambiguous. We can thank SCOTUS for that. They certainly won’t clarify anything though. The whole thing was brought because of...
  4. S

    Caitlin Clark finally

    That post makes zero sense. I think the graph matters. You say you disagree and then ask me to list what matters. WTF. Please say what you think matters. You’re the one with the opposing opinion.
  5. S

    Caitlin Clark finally

    Here’s why I would do it. While a large percentage of males are doubling down on “Bro culture”, with the support of their older ages influencers, women are taking over in the stuff that matters.
  6. S

    Caitlin Clark finally

    I saw an article that makes this debate a little different. Would you invest in a WNBA team right now? Not like "whole net worth" kind of thing, but would you put meaningful money into shares of a WNBA team with a long-term view?
  7. S

    “Protecting access for hunters and anglers act”

    It's stupid. It should be voted down. Someone is trying to make a name for himself. That said, Congress is very into stupid, meaningless stuff right now.
  8. S

    Moving Trends for 2025

    Agreed. I point that out in every housing discussion. the insurance and taxes are predictable, but those surprise costs are what bite people in the butt. Most of the analysis I see just incorporates ongoing maintenance cost of 3-5% of the value of the home. Seems reasonable but that can be a lot...
  9. S

    Moving Trends for 2025

    Nick's coming in hot with a bold statement! LOL. Lot of overlap in these maps. Not enough for me to call bullshit. We can pick apart the methodology but math and stats are not HT strengths.
  10. S

    Federal Land Sales for Affordable Housing?

    You going for my title of HT Bleeding-heart Liberal?
  11. S

    Federal Land Sales for Affordable Housing?

    The US government literally built a couple of cities for the Manhattan Project. When needed, it is amazing what the US can accomplish.
  12. S

    Federal Land Sales for Affordable Housing?

    Yes. I agree and understand that for Federal employees this is happening in a lot of places. I might even be more accepting of just building the units for the Federal employees. I don't think the units for locals is appropriate. This specific problem is not happening in Cody, but certainly...
  13. S

    Nope smokers not allowed

    I thought maybe there was a decision, but not yet it seems. The most recent arguments sound like they could have been entertaining. “On Monday, Principal Deputy Solicitor General Sarah Harris tried to pass the Court’s historical test by arguing that a few 18th-century state laws restricting...
  14. S

    Federal Land Sales for Affordable Housing?

    I don’t like the idea of a handout to the highest income county in the country. If we want stuff, we have to pay for it. The answer is a tax. If you can’t house enough working people to service the tourists, they can go to Cody. Economics is about tradeoffs. Slowly degrading the ecosystem that...
  15. S

    Federal Land Sales for Affordable Housing?

    Costs adjust. The cost of living in California is very high. Somehow they have teachers. Jackson can tax the residents to pay teachers the appropriate wage. The wealthy will also find a way to get their garbage picked up. No one wants to pay taxes but want what the taxes provide. This isn’t a...
  16. S

    Federal Land Sales for Affordable Housing?

    I certainly have taken heat for my answer, but it remains the same-Move. Society does not owe any individual affordability in the zip code of their choice. And once the answer becomes a handout the answer to every future problem will be a handout.
  17. S

    Federal Land Sales for Affordable Housing?

    Don’t be greedy.
  18. S

    Federal Land Sales for Affordable Housing?

    🏅 Congrats. Here's your medal.
  19. S

    Anybody Buying Yet? Where’s the Bottom?

    "Closed" has always been a little bit of a misnomer. Tankers have been going through for the last week, mostly bound for China and India. Other tankers are filling at Jask. The choice is to let the oil flow or deal with prices at $120-$140. Hard to see a way out of this in the short term.
  20. S

    Federal Land Sales for Affordable Housing?

    I'll bump the topic with this article. Small giveaways are the new land-transfer. The application of a special use permit to build permanent housing looks like a new strategy. Relying on a legal victory from a private individual in this case shows how fully unprepared we are for these types of...
Gastro Gnome - Eat Better Wherever

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
118,636
Messages
2,200,894
Members
38,599
Latest member
HuntLedger

Share this page

Back
Top