Treeshark's latest activity
-
Yeah, that’s equivalent to me telling a 70 year old they should have investing in bitcoin coin 15 years ago. I think it was smart you... -
i think we're gonna be forced and end up on a majority nuclear grid. it just feels obvious. it seems to be an inevitability in my mind...
-
I won't comment about buying elections, etc. The party I more fully identify with, has vilified oil companies for as long as I can...
-
Pretty common around here
-
Bear #9 dead on the highway this morning. Those are just the ones I've seen, they usually get picked up pretty quick around here...
-
It may not even take a full blown recession for the impacts to possibly start hitting. Factors such as cost of living, wage raises not...
-
Let's compare to Wyoming. WY had ~230,000 mule deer in 2024, MT had ~250,000 mule deer in 2024. WY total MD harvest = 14,179 bucks...
-
No, it doesnt. Region 6 and 7 in MT have more deer killed by NR than Wyoming has state wide. By a big margin.
-
Why I said it’s a season structure situation . Needs to be pick your region/area no statewide
-
Treeshark replied to the thread Montana draw 2026.The data appears to support this claim.
-
Yes I completely understand that you think more funding is better for wildlife. The way that Montana manages that is not the case.
-
@Treeshark 2692 vs 4011 Next time anyone gives anyone a speech about mule deer need "help" in montana in r6 and r7 - is it hard to see...
-
Treeshark replied to the thread Montana draw 2026.Are you reading those charts correctly? Residents are the blue ones: way larger participation, way smaller contributions to funding.
-
Treeshark replied to the thread Montana draw 2026.Calm down there, big fella- just posting some data I thought you guys would find enlightening.
-
Treeshark replied to the thread Montana draw 2026.Here is some data I think you may be interested in.
-
