Who pissed in your Cheerios today? Holy hell man get a grip.
Because I pointed out some valid concerns about the wrong type of case coming up in Montana I some how "work for Knudsen or UPOM"? What a self-righteous blowhard comment.
You want to do it up here, I'd be glad to represent you...
Well seeing as I have significant experience in front of numerous courts and judges, I can tell you most state and federal judges in Montana don't care about what the 10th Cir does in any type of case, and will make a decision based on the outcome they want and find case law to justify it. Just...
I think that's correct. And that'll be the problem. The case they'll prosecute is the 4 road hunters pounding Busch Light and breaking down a corner fence and causing an altercation with the landowner/LE.
I think you're underestimating the very significant impact of a case having slightly different facts that allow a court to make a completely opposite decision than the 10th Cir came to. Ideally, there would be a case in MT, or some other state in the 9th, that's virtually the same - federal...
Not necessarily. There was basically zero chance SCOTUS was going to take this appeal in the first place. The only way I see SCOTUS taking up this issue is if another Circuit rules the other way on corner crossing. Until that happens, SCOTUS won't have a reason to rule on this issue. As this...
I have a VX3 on my go to hunting rifle (7Mag), and although I don't hate it, I'm not sure I'd buy it again. I think Vortex makes better glass for a similar price point, and the one high end Vortex scope I have on another hunting rifle is heads and shoulders above the Leupold.
That being...
As someone who dabbles in the law for a day job, I agree this would be the best "low risk, high reward" tactic. I haven't read the whole 10th Cir opinion yet, but I am curious as to how the 9th Cir would approach this. The Tenth is generally more conservative than the Ninth in their rulings...