@Don Fischer You’re correct about the exposure levels being different so yes the facts could be spun either way to support either side of an argument. You’re also correct in saying “MOST” because there are few absolutes in this world and there are usually outliers. I still say the odds are so greatly in his favor he should take his 3 year old everywhere to to everything and educate her hands on as much as possible as I personally do with my 3 year old.
My question to you is when do you think it’s ok to take off the bubble wrap?
You state “I would not take a three year old hunting in country where I might run into a bear especially with a bow if I bow hunted.” When they’re old enough to make adult decisions on their own? When they’re old enough to be packing heat and protect themselves?
And if it’s just the lack of firearms protection that’s your concern, just know that firearms are in the top 3 of the causes of childhood death, so by running around with guns to be safe, instead of bows, you’ve increased exposure to that cause cause of childhood death. So if risk aversion is the number one job of a parent then
@jlong17 and myself are doing terrible jobs…