Treeshark's latest activity

  • Treeshark
    Treeshark replied to the thread No King's Deer.
    Semantics, but yes- agree.
  • Treeshark
    Treeshark replied to the thread No King's Deer.
    This isn’t about what is best for me, it’s about what the best path forward is for everyone (as well as the wildlife resource).
  • Treeshark
    Treeshark replied to the thread No King's Deer.
    No worries man, I get it- I’m just some dude on a hunting website. Different perspectives are cool with me👍
  • Treeshark
    Treeshark reacted to Irrelevant's post in the thread No King's Deer with Like Like.
    To play devil's advocate a bit. The public can hunt public lands. They already can't explicitly hunt private, so granting wildlife to...
  • Treeshark
    Treeshark replied to the thread No King's Deer.
    Sure thing. My responses are directed towards Montana and its wildlife resources, as it is the subject of this thread. 1. Wildlife...
  • Treeshark
    Treeshark replied to the thread No King's Deer.
    Does it concern you that the concept of state owned wildlife is in conflict with the 1st, 3rd, 5th and 6th pillars of the NAM?
  • Treeshark
    Treeshark replied to the thread Football General Talk.
    Micah earned his money today, first 3-sack game of his career (had a 4th called back by a hip-drop call). Even at that, the Pack came...
  • Treeshark
    Treeshark replied to the thread No King's Deer.
    I’m not sure I agree, the New Mexico landowner tag program is very well structured in my opinion. Colorado’s program is decent as well...
  • Treeshark
    Treeshark reacted to mtmuley's post in the thread No King's Deer with Like Like.
    I just got back from a no kings antelope hunt. It was awesome. mtmuley
  • Treeshark
    Treeshark reacted to Jbaldwin40's post in the thread No King's Deer with Like Like.
    I belive a transferable landowner tags = whoever pays the highest price for said tag. BMA = open to anyone regardless of what their...
  • Treeshark
    Treeshark replied to the thread No King's Deer.
    It’s up to state residents to craft a program that benefits everyone. New Mexico has provided a template of a good start, in my...
  • Treeshark
    Treeshark replied to the thread No King's Deer.
    How do you not? Both programs compensate private land owners for their role in improving game populations/public hunting access. Both...
  • Treeshark
    Treeshark replied to the thread No King's Deer.
    Providing public access to private land is a huge benefit of these programs, perhaps the biggest of many. BMA-enrolled lands are also...
  • Treeshark
    Treeshark reacted to Frequently Banned Troll's post in the thread No King's Deer with Haha Haha.
    Me too on reading that - but fuqh that on the transferable landowner tags.
  • Treeshark
    I had that happen on Hwy 10 (4-lane highway) once on the way to deer camp. It was a true emergency. A waist deep snow bank provided my...
Back
Top