I'm not sure if that is the correct term or what, but that's what I've heard them called - after striking the firing pin the hammer bounces back to about what would be half-kock position.
Yeah, I've also heard it called the solution to a problem that didn't exist.
OH, sounds like we are all saying a similar thing. If you have the desire and the tools go for it. If you want to let the guy who is installing the barrel give the rest his expert attention go for it too!
While, at 61 yo I do question the younger generation :), but it's not over this issue.
Thanks for the suggestion.
I did a cursory search, but didn't dig/read deeper. Sounds like there are some issues of reliability and perhaps better trigger pull if changed.
You Sir are a hardcore, dedicated bowhunter. (y)
A friend and I drew up that way in the late '90, I was using a recurve bow at the time. I took my 30-06 on our second trip. Bad fires that year...never saw a moose.
I'll add another vote for p-ham. After so many good references, I had him work on my -06 and I am very please with the service and the work.
I had some work on a handgun, Paul recommend another guy he felt would be a better choice. That's an extremely rare quality these days called...
So I've read and seen where folks are dead set on removing a rebounding hammer from their lever action rifles. What do you gain by removing it if it's already there?
Just wondering if the expense of removing it is worth it.
I did a little looking around, and if I read correctly, the world record B&C Shiras moose had a 53" spread and was shot in the early 1950s. 50" these days is ambitious.
I was wondering if anyone has any experience with the current production wood and blued model 70s? Specifically the Safari Express model.
How is their off the shelf quality, dependability, accuracy, fit/finish, etc?
Thanks.