The IDFG table above seems to indicate that people are accepting of a lot of technological advances.
Interesting that while IDFG's technology task force is working on this the legislature is pushing a bill through to limit IDFG's ability to restrict muzzleloaders. H128 for anyone that is...
Politicians and developers will will be lined up like pigs at a trough for this.
The public will see no benefit, and certainly people who can't afford a house still will not be able to afford a house.
Wildlife will get the shaft as always.
In the last few election cycles I have chosen not to vote for anyone in favor of transfer or disposal of public land. I have let those candidates know that. They all won landslide victories. I do not understand how people can give them a free pass on this terrible idea.
I figure there are...
It will be interesting to see how many of the team's recommendations are implemented.
Every applicant buying hunting license before applying may deter some people.
Make no mistake, this effort is about getting public lands into private hands. It is not about affordable housing, better land management, or federal vs. state government. Those are just red herrings to confuse the issue.
States are simply the avenue to make the land sales happen...
Lets be realistic. Most ranchers don't want fewer elk, they want more money from elk being there. Preferably as a handout.
This will pass easily. It's like asking the politicians to not give themselves a handout...
Obviously it's your fault. Also, if something good happens it's obviously because of her. No details necessary. Circumstances don't matter. Just move along and remain happy.
A well known real estate tactic to convince a neighbor to pay more for land than they should is to threaten an auction that would bring in an undesirable entity. Probably what the land board is trying to do to the feds.
If the state actually sells they'll piss the money away quickly and have...