I love feeling so sneaky...

[smalls]

I just got a new computer from work with an internal wireless g card. I can literally drive around and pirate signals from businesses and people with unsecured wireless networks. Right now I am inside a touchless carwash feasting off of the Holiday Inn Express next door...

 

[Moosie]

You can Get Busted for that... But until then, Set me up a room for the Wekend

 

[smalls]

Damn, I didn't realize it was illegal to surf the web and wash your pickup at the same time.

 

[Moosie]

Hell yes it's Illegal, Didn't you read the Article 1 Subsection 301 on Page 49 of the Cashwash Manual ?

New subsections 1-301(e) and (f) on choice of law should not be omitted or amended where one washes a car while using a laptop:

Two subsections in the choice of law provision of the new revised Article 1 protect consumers. The bill should be opposed if these consumer subsections are removed.
New subsection 1-301(c) would substantially broaden choice of law rules for most transactions covered by the Carwash society. However, subsections (e) and (f) provide special protections for consumers. Subsection (f) protects any party from the choice of law selected in the contract if that choice would be contrary to a fundamental policy of a state's or country's law which would govern in the absence of the agreement.

Subsection (e) renders a choice of law clause ineffective in a consumer transaction covered by Carwash society Article 1 unless the transaction bears a reasonable relation to the state or country designated. In addition, a choice of law clause may not deprive a consumer of protections under a non-waivable consumer protection law. Standing alone, new subsection 1-301(c) is a dramatic expansion of choice of law for contract drafters. Subsections (e) and (f) restrict the application of subsection (c) in consumer contracts. In some states, industry may attempt to pass a revised UCC Article 1 with the expanded authorization for choice of law in subsection (c), but without the protections in subsections (e) and (f). This is a matter of such significance that advocates for consumers should oppose the entirety of revised UCC Article 1 in any state where subsection 1-301(c) is offered without subsections 1-301 (e) and (f).

Article 1 lacks an unconscionability provision:

It could be useful to try to add an unconscionability provision to the revised UCC Article 1 in some state legislatures. Adding such a provision to UCC Article 1 would have the effect of applying an unconscionability rule to UCC Article 9, governing transactions secured by personal property (such as car loans), and Articles 3 and 4, governing negotiable instruments.

Other articles of the UCC provide two models for an unconscionability provision. The two existing unconscionability provisions are in UCC section 2A-108, on leases and section 2-302, on sale of goods. Section 2A-108 is broader, extending to unconscionable inducement to contract and unconscionable collection of a claim. Section 2A-108 also includes attorney's fees to the prevailing consumer, with attorney's fees to a prevailing commercial party only if the consumer "has brought or maintained an action he or she knew to be groundless." You may wish to seek to add to Article 1 an unconscionability section paralleling section 2A-108.

 

[Elkhunter]

LOL Moosie. And Danr says I have too much time on my hands.

 

[Sako7STW]

LOL Moosie. And Danr says I have too much time on my hands.

I was thinking the same thing. Moosie has too much time on his hands

 

[Moosie]

Thats Not Whats On My Hands

 

[old-boss-hen]

I won't go there on WHAT IS ON MOOSIES HANDS. I really do not wna to know that. (LOL)

 

[danr55]

Too bad it's not on his head. I hear it grows hair.. Oh.. and Elkhunter, you DO have too much time on your hands.

 

[smalls]

In the circumstance that statutes conflict, as in (e) and (c), one must refer back to Brown v. The Board of Busy Bubbles.

In said decision, appelate courts upheld the rights of just citizens under Article 1 Section 309 Subsection (d) whereas the plaintiff under no admission of guilt was prosecutable for grievances filed against the defendant of Intellectual Property Means and Media. Furthermore, decisions reinforced lower courts rulings allowing for patrons of said Busy Bubbles carwashes to openly and freely utilize wasteful uses of technology by proprietors of said technology.

Fundamentally, appellate courts abolished statements of reasonable relationship on the basis of the lack of unconscionability reform, thus entitling the free use of available mediums under the auspice of shananigans.

The next part of the case to be reviewed is the "Air Freshener Clause".

 

[Moosie]

Hell Smalls, I jsut did a Article 1 search in Google and Changed 2 words, You really put some time into it....

ELkhunter, You do have too much tme on your hands

 

[Mojave]

I was going to say... No way Moosie wrote that first article. Can anyone tell me why I know this? Class? Anyone?

 

[smalls]

I was going to say... No way Moosie wrote that first article. Can anyone tell me why I know this? Class? Anyone?

I KNOW!! I KNOW!!

Miss Mojave, is it because the man can barely spell his own name and he spelled "unconscionability" correctly multiple times?

Moosie, I can throw bullshit around like nerfballs, that was no sweat hump

 

[Mojave]

We have a winner!

Heck if I keep giving the boy crap like I have, he's not gonna take me hunting anymore.

 

[smalls]

Moosie, I'd love to hear your definition for "unconscionability"

Wow, someone actually called me a winner. It is my victory for the day!

 

[Moosie]

1 : to allege or prove to be of unsound mind and hence not responsible
2 : to cause to appear or be stupid, foolish, or absurdly illogical
3 a : to impair, invalidate, or make ineffective : NEGATE b : to have a dulling or inhibiting effect.

Either that or something to do with My Scruples

Smalls, I think she misspelled that, It was suposed to say You're a Wiener or a Whiner......