snake river rufus
New member
A former disgruntled employee is chasing around the internet making (I'm told) false charges about these bullets.after e-mailing Barnes I recieved this reply
Yes, we have seen it and are preparing a statement.
He was not a ballistician but a helper in the lab.
Tests were not skewed, in fact, our competitors bullets shot better in the test than they ever had before and ours shot worse than they ever had before but we used the test results we got at the time.
All ammunition was loaded exactly the same.
For some reason, this past employee just has a hard time accepting a companies successes.
It is unfortunate that he has so much time on his hands to be miserable and bad mouth a company that treated him very fair while employed at Barnes.
Thanks for the heads up.
Coni Brooks
thought I should get this up before he finds this place
Yes, we have seen it and are preparing a statement.
He was not a ballistician but a helper in the lab.
Tests were not skewed, in fact, our competitors bullets shot better in the test than they ever had before and ours shot worse than they ever had before but we used the test results we got at the time.
All ammunition was loaded exactly the same.
For some reason, this past employee just has a hard time accepting a companies successes.
It is unfortunate that he has so much time on his hands to be miserable and bad mouth a company that treated him very fair while employed at Barnes.
Thanks for the heads up.
Coni Brooks
thought I should get this up before he finds this place