I’m impressed that he’s actually an active member in the forum, and ill be even more impressed if he actually listens to the opposing view, seriously considers it, and has the gumption to admit when wrong. Being against public access to public land because there are poachers and trespassers out...
That's an odd bar to set. Of all the court decisions in the country every year, SCOTUS reviews less than 100. If you apply that logic to other laws, you basically don't believe in 99.99% of them. You rebel you.
Here's the thing - we are not for asking corner crossing to be legal. We are saying its never been a trespass. Therefore, any ranch with checkerboard is and always has always been subject to "corner crossing potential". If you purchased it thinking that wasn't the case and paid more for it, you...
I think much of the contention surrounding this issue comes from a misunderstanding of how government works. I thought we've moved past this. We aren’t talking about the legislature changing the law; we’re talking about a court interpreting and clarifying existing law. If a court determines that...
You’re right on the money.
We didn’t get the opportunity to review or fully understand the changes before they were implemented, and they are big changes. It seems like it might put some weight into access for parcels, the problem is that the state doesn’t think “corner locked” parcels are...
100% not true. Most access issues are far from simple. In fact, many take years or research and a lot of lawyers.
I can point you to dozens of cases that ended up with roads being proved public, only after years of research and legal battles. It’s sad they have to end that way.
Boy I’m glad not everyone thinks like you - lots of jumping to conclusions here. I’m glad that people that have the public’s interest at heart are looking into this and will make a case for it being a public road if warranted.
I’ll tell you what needs to stop if it is a private road - all...
Ya’ll are forgetting about prescriptive use, what it is, and why it’s a thing.
A gas tax road is a solid showing for the judge to grant a prescriptive use easement.
Want to know one of the reasons why prescriptive use is a thing? Some view it as a takings of private property. Others view it as...
PLWA did a good job summarizing the issue:
(https://static1.squarespace.com/static/6002236795a3752c3a5420f6/t/683f49342aba071c74502444/1748977993059/Key+Quarterly+Spring+2025_compressed.pdf)
PLWA is also a good resource for updates on these types of issues - Alex and crew will work hard.
Looking to sell my binoculars - they are in great condition and basically brand new - comes with everything Swaro gives you when you buy new.
$1500 - willing to entertain offers.
I don't think its immoral for a person to not allow public access to said persons property. I do believe that it is immoral to block access to said public's property. I believe corner crossing is a valid tool for the public to access public property.
We are on the same page. What I mean by “their” is their deeded land.
I’m probably the biggest advocate for public land and public land access that you’ll ever meet. Clearly defined boundaries are good for everyone involved. Clearly mark the private land and don’t restrict access to the public...
That's what I'm saying. He'd define is property and not care what happens beyond it - including corner crossing to public land.
I don't agree with your last statement. Its not immoral for a person to not allow public access to their property.
If you cross knowing that there isn't a pin, aren't you crossing knowing that you're likely trespassing? So the intent would then be to trespass?
This is a great thing and a great decision, lets try not to mess it up. We should be raising money for surveyors to start setting pins!
A moral...
HB 676 Update - They just uploaded an amendment to the bill.
Link here:
https://docs.legmt.gov/download-ticket?ticketId=dfc16a4f-82fb-48d3-b328-046fa2729baf
Guess what - there isn't one word about selling public lands in this amendment!!!!
HB 676 Update - They just uploaded an amendment to the bill.
Link here:
https://docs.legmt.gov/download-ticket?ticketId=dfc16a4f-82fb-48d3-b328-046fa2729baf
Guess what - there isn't one word about selling public lands in this amendment!!!!
I was surprised to see that people are saying they are okay on private land but not public. The comments are also leaning toward that its not fair chase. Its not fair chase on public land but it is on private land? Weird.